This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background and purpose Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) manages anatomical variations through real-time plan adjustments. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ART in improving target coverage and reducing organ-at-risk (OAR) irradiation doses in cervical cancer. Materials and methods A prospective single-arm study enrolled 15 patients with cervical cancer. Participants received definitive chemoradiotherapy (45–50 Gy/25Fractions) using cone-beam computed tomography-guided online ART workflow. Endpoints included geometric miss volume (target volume underdosed), planning target volume (PTV) coverage (V 100% ), OAR sparing (generalized equivalent uniform dose [gEUD] and normal tissue complication probability [NTCP]), and dose homogeneity/conformity parameters (coefficient of variation [CV], Paddick Index [PI]). Mixed-effects models compared ART and simulated image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) plans, with Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests for statistical analysis. Results Among 375 adaptive sessions, ART outperformed IGRT, reduced geometric miss volume by 85.1% (0.28 cm 3 vs. 1.88 cm 3 ; P < 0.001) and achieved V 100% ≥ 99% in 99.2% of fractions (vs. 75.0% with IGRT; P < 0.001). ART improved PTV dose homogeneity (median CV: −0.29% vs. 3.89%; P < 0.001) and conformity (median PI: 0.75 vs. 0.60; P < 0.001). Additionally, ART reduced rectum gEUD by 4.39% ( P < 0.001) and NTCP by 52.27% ( P < 0.001), with similar benefits for other OARs ( P < 0.001). ART maintained robustness against intrafractional anatomical changes, with minimal target coverage loss and stable OAR doses despite bladder/rectum volume fluctuations. Patients exhibited 100% complete response and mild acute side effects (no grade ≥ 3 enteritis; no cystitis). Conclusions Online ART with 3-mm isotropic margins is feasibile for cervical cancer, achieved high target coverage while reduced OAR doses and NTCP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: