Key result
Exercise oxygenation distinguishes left-heart from pulmonary-vascular dysfunction with an AUC of ~0.89.
Observational (n=253)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Whether systemic oxygen levels (SaO 2 ) during exercise can provide a window into invasively derived exercise hemodynamic profiles in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea on exertion is unknown. Methods We performed cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring and arterial blood gas sampling in individuals referred for dyspnea on exertion. Receiver operator analysis was performed to distinguish heart failure with preserved ejection fraction from pulmonary arterial hypertension. Results Among 253 patients (mean ± SD, age 63 ± 14 years, 55% female, arterial O 2 [PaO 2 ] 87 ± 14 mmHg, SaO 2 96% ± 4%, resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] 18 ± 4mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] 2.7 ± 1.2 Wood units), there was no exercise PCWP threshold, measured up to 49 mmHg, above which hypoxemia was consistently observed. Exercise PaO 2 was not correlated with exercise PCWP (rho = 0.04; P = 0.51) but did relate to exercise PVR (rho = -0.46; P < 0.001). Exercise PaO 2 and SaO 2 levels distinguished left-heart-predominant dysfunction from pulmonary-vascular-predominant dysfunction with an area under the curve of 0.89 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusion Systemic O 2 levels during exercise distinguish relative pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hemodynamic abnormalities in patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. Hypoxemia during upright exercise should not be attributed to isolated elevation in left heart filling pressures and should prompt consideration of pulmonary vascular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hardin et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Undifferentiated dyspnea on exertion (n=253). Systemic arterial oxygen levels (PaO2 and SaO2) during exercise vs. Invasive exercise hemodynamic profiles (left-heart-predominant vs. pulmonary-vascular-predominant dysfunction) was evaluated on Distinguishing left-heart-predominant dysfunction (HFpEF) from pulmonary-vascular-predominant dysfunction (PAH) and correlation with exercise PVR/PCWP (AUC 0.89; rho -0.46 (for PaO2 with exercise PVR), p=<0.001). Exercise PaO2 and SaO2 levels distinguished left-heart-predominant from pulmonary-vascular-predominant dysfunction (AUC 0.89 for both) and correlated with exercise PVR (rho=-0.46; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: