Multiple series of laboratory undrained cyclic triaxial tests and bender element tests are conducted to obtain pairing data for R l and G o for laboratory reconstituted samples of silty sands. Several categories of silty sands in a ‘fines in sand’ matrix are prepared using coarse, medium, and fine sands as the host sands and non-plastic fines with different fines contents of F c = 0–30% as the guest silt. The concept of the equivalent intergranular void ratio is that it is used to deduce the b -values for R l and G o . Instead of applying the empirical expression, as employed in past studies, the b -values are determined by directly fitting the silty sand data to the corresponding backbone clean sand relation. The fictitious active fines content, defined as F c * = bF c , is then introduced, which bears a good physical meaning for mechanical interpretations of the test results. F c * tends to increase rapidly as F c increases, following the empirical expression of F c * = μF c 2 . The corresponding values for F c.l * and F c.s * for large-strain R l and small-strain G o , respectively, are directly compared. It is found that they take different values, and that the ratio of F c.l */ F c.s * is dependent on the size disparity ratio for χ and F c . The implications of this experimental finding are discussed with respect to the micromechanical modelling of the silty sand behaviour. The differences in the values for F c.l * and F c.s * are found to lead to multiple series of cyclic resistance ratio CRR and shear wave velocity V s relations for silty sands with different F c , which are comparable to the empirical relations given in past studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: