Why the study?
Transversus abdominis dysfunctions are associated with low back pain, but comparisons of its activation and back muscle strength across healthy individuals and those with back conditions needed evaluation.
Transversus abdominis activation does not significantly differ between healthy men and those with low back pain or disc herniation, though the latter groups exhibit reduced back muscle strength.
Activation differences may inform LBP assessment; leaves open causality and treatment effects in herniation.
Introduction: The transversus abdominis seems to be the key stabilizing muscle of the back, and its dysfunctions are associated with the development of low back pain (LBP). Objective: To compare the activation of the transversus abdominis and back muscle strength between self-reported healthy individuals, individuals with non-specific LBP, and individuals with disc herniation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study carried out with male individuals intentionally divided into: healthy group (HG), non-specific LBP group (LBPG), and herniated disc group (HDG). The outcomes evaluated were pain, flexibility, disability, back muscle strength and transversus abdominis activation. Results: Thirty individuals were selected. Regarding the activation of the transversus abdominis, 60% of the HG had excellent activation, while for the LBPG and HDG it was only 30 and 20%, respectively. However, there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.155). For strength, both the LBPG and the HDG were different compared to the HG (p = 0.028 and p = 0.045, respectively). Conclusion: The activation of the transversus abdominis seems to be similar between healthy individuals, individuals with non-specific LBP, and those with disc herniation. However, individuals with a herniated disc had less strength and greater disability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: