Ceftazidime was introduced into our hospital during the second half of 1987. It was aimed especially for use in the intensive care unit to treat infections with gram-negative bacilli with diminished sensitivity for cefuroxime, at that time the first-line β-lactam antibiotic for serious infections. At that time Escherichia coli and Klebsiella sp. isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime. An increase in cefuroxime-resistant isolates was noted, resulting in an increase in the use of ceftazidime. A few months later ceftazidime-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were isolated. It could be shown that these isolates harbored different plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), at that time a rare phenomenon (7). The phenotypic characteristics of the isolates and the β-lactamases were reported (10), and the epidemiology is summarized in Fig. 1. From a patient treated with ceftazidime, and in whom the first K. pneumoniae producing an ESBL, called “Caz-lo” (Isoelectric focusing point [pl], 5.6), was observed, 10 days later a more resistant K. pneumoniae, of the same serotype, with an identical arbitrarily primed PCR profile and with a “Caz-hi” enzyme, was isolated. This was indicative of Caz-hi being an in vivo-selected mutant of Caz-lo. Starting from the Caz-lo K. pneumoniae, in vitro selection with ceftazidime resulted in a strain that produced an ESBL with the Caz-hi phenotype. This reinforced the hypothesis of in vivo selection, initially based on epidemiological data only.Fig. 1.Epidemiology of ESBLs. M, mutation of enzyme; T, transfer of plasmid to another serotype or another species; ?, period of apparent disappearance of the enzyme. Months are abbreviated at the top.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claeys et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: