Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic utility of HE4 with NSE, ProGRP, CYFRA 21-1, CEA, and CA 125 and evaluate their prognostic value in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: HE4, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, CEA, and CA 125 assays were performed in 63 patients with smallcell lung cancer (limited disease (LD) - 41, extensive disease (ED) - 22) and in 66 individuals of the reference group. RESULTS: Area under the ROC curves for HE4, ProGRP, NSE, CA 125, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA were 0.884, 0.923, 0.826, 0.796, 0.739, and 0.704, respectively. The tumor marker serum concentrations were associated with tumor stage (HE4, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, CEA), and disease progression occurred within one year (HE4, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1). The tumor advancement, performance status, gender and tumor markers, except CEA and CA 125, were significantly associated with survival. Independent, unfavourable prognostic factors included extensive disease (HR 4.14, p < 0.0001) and NSE concentration above 35 g/l (HR 2.62, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic utility of HE4 was similar to that of NSE and ProGRP. Complementary to NSE, determination of HE4 seems to be helpful in evaluation of SCLC patients' prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wójcik et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: