The central claim of this paper is that theories themselves qualify for definition as systems. Part 1 follows a progression of definitions of system, attempting to end with a relatively sophisticated definition which nonetheless retains the basic intuitive characteristic of structure. Part 2 outlines the definition of theory that I am using (which must be seen as a qualification of the central claim), namely the ‘structuralist’ view of Sneed and Stegmuller. Part 3 relates the definitions arrived at in the preceding parts, to arrive at the aforementioned conclusion. It goes on to discuss some of the implications of this position.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick Curry (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: