Why the study?
Does dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT improve the prediction of carcinoma in patients with thymic epithelial neoplasms compared to chest CT?
Does dual-time-point F-18 FDG PET/CT improve the prediction of carcinoma in patients with thymic epithelial neoplasms compared to chest CT?
Delayed F-18 FDG PET/CT scanning and CT-derived mediastinal fat infiltration provide moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting carcinoma in thymic epithelial neoplasms.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DTP FDG PET/CT may aid TEN carcinoma prediction over CT; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We retrospectively assessed the dual-time-point (DTP) F-18 FDG PET/CT findings of thymic epithelial neoplasms (TENs) and investigated the diagnostic capacity of PET/CT compared to that of CT for predicting carcinoma. We calculated the ratio of the standardized uptake value of the tumor and that of the aortic arch (T/M ratio) for both the 90-min early scan and the 2-h delayed scan in 56 TEN patients. We used a multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis to estimate the CT features of carcinoma. We compared the diagnostic capacities of PET/CT and chest CT using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. The ROC curve revealed that the appropriate cut-off T/M ratio value for the highest accuracy was 2.39 with 75.0% accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.855. The statistical analyses for DTP scans of 35 TEN patients demonstrated 74.3% accuracy and 0.838 AUC for the early scan versus 82.9% and 0.825 for the delayed scan. The MLR analysis indicated that mediastinal fat infiltration was a predictor of carcinoma. The ROC curve obtained for the model yielded an AUC of 0.853. Delayed scanning could improve the diagnostic capacity for carcinoma. The T/M ratio and mediastinal fat infiltration are predictive of carcinoma with moderate diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinya et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: