Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prior studies demonstrated that ceramide was phosphorylated by a novel Ca(2+)-dependent kinase distinct from diacylglycerol (DG) kinase in human myelogenous leukemia (HL-60) cells (Kolesnick, R. N., and Hemer, M. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10900-10904). The present studies were initiated to determine whether mammalian DG kinase purified to homogeneity possessed phosphotransferase activity toward ceramide. A high molecular weight rat brain DG kinase demonstrated Mg(2+)-(but not Ca(2+)-) dependent DG kinase activity and did not phosphorylate ceramide in the presence of either cation. In contrast, ceramide served as a competitive inhibitor with an inhibition constant (Ki) 2-6-fold greater than the Km for DG. Inhibition was noncompetitive with respect to ATP and Mg2+. A cell-permeable ceramide, N-octanoyl sphingosine (C8-cer), was used to study effects of ceramide on DG kinase in intact HL-60 cells. C8-cer induced dose- and time-dependent increases in cellular DG levels. As little as 1 microM C8-cer increased DG from a basal level of 103 to 177 pmol.10(6) cells-1, and a maximal 2.9-fold elevation to 292 pmol.10(6) cells-1 occurred with 10 microM C8-cer. DG elevation was detected after 1 min, maximal by 7.5 min, and sustained for 30 min. The DG elevation was accompanied by a reduction in 32P incorporation in phosphatidic acid in cells short term-labeled with [32P]orthophosphoric acid, consistent with inhibition of DG kinase. In contrast, a similar elevation in the DG level induced by exogenous phospholipase C increased 32P incorporation into phosphatidic acid. C8-cer was not metabolized to sphingomyelin, indicating that DG was not generated through the phosphatidylcholine:ceramide cholinephosphotransferase reaction. DG elevation after C8-cer or phospholipase C treatment was sufficient to redistribute protein kinase C from cytosol to membrane. These findings provide evidence that ceramide may serve as a competitive inhibitor of DG kinase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younes et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: