Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I analyse a series of natural quasi-experimentscentred on betting exchange data on the Wimbledon Tennis Championshipsto determine whether information processing constraints are partially responsible for mispricing in asset markets. I find that the arrival of information during each match leads to substantial mispricing between two equivalent assets, and that part of this mispricing can be attributed to differences in the frequency with which the two prices are updated inplay. This suggests that information processing constraints force the periodic neglect of one of the assets, thereby causing substantial, albeit temporary, mispricing in this simple asset market.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alasdair Brown (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: