Why the study?
Does the implantation of recycled antemortem CRM devices provide a safe and feasible alternative for underprivileged patients with Class I indications?
Does the implantation of recycled antemortem CRM devices provide a safe and feasible alternative for underprivileged patients with Class I indications?
Implantation of recycled antemortem CRM devices appears safe and feasible with no device infections or malfunctions over long-term follow-up, offering a potential solution for underprivileged patients.
No complications seen in this case series; leaves open prospective trials before considering recycled CRM devices for underprivileged patients.
INTRODUCTION: Patients in underdeveloped nations have limited access to life-saving medical technology including cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices. We evaluated alternative means to provide such technology to this patient population while assessing the safety and efficacy of such a practice. METHODS: Patients in the United States with clinical indications for extraction of CRM devices were consented. Antemortem CRM devices were cleaned and sterilized following a protocol established at our institution. Surveillance in vitro cultures were performed for quality assurance. The functional status of pulse generators was tested with a pacing system analyzer to confirm at least 70% battery life. Most generators were transported, in person, to an implanting institution in Nicaragua. Recipients with a Class I indication for CRM implantation, and meeting economical criteria set forth, were consented for implantation of a recycled device. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2009, implantation was performed in 17 patients with an average age of 42.1 ± 20.3 years. Of the 17 patients, nine were male and eight were female. Mean follow-up was 68 ± 38 months. Device evaluation occurred prior to discharge, 4 weeks post implantation, and every 6 months thereafter. There were three deaths during the follow-up period secondary to myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure. Hematoma formation occurred in one patient. No infections, early battery depletion, or device malfunction were identified during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series is the longest follow-up of recipients of recycled antemortem CRM devices. Our findings support the feasibility and safety of this alternative acquisition of life-saving technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: