In this correspondence, we point out a discrepancy in a recent paper, "data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors," that was published in this journal. Because of the small percentage of defective modules, using probability of detection (pd) and probability of false alarm (pf) as accuracy measures may lead to impractical prediction models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: