Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article provides an institutional analysis of the Mekong River Commission and brings to light the institutional dissonances between regional and national decision-making landscapes in the Lower Mekong Basin. The current scalar disconnect between regional and national decision-making processes reflects how international donors and member country representatives obscure potential conflict/tension in transboundary water governance in the Mekong. From a scholarly perspective, it questions academic approaches that assume that the state is the sole or primary actor in international relations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suhardiman et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: