This paper provides a new perspective for the study on the influencing factors of total factor productivity of cultivated land resource utilization (CL-TFP). Due to the dynamic continuity and spatial dependence of CL-TFP, this paper analyses the main factors affecting CL-TFP. The results show that regional urban–rural income level difference has a significant positive spatial autocorrelation on cultivated land resources. From the perspective of spatial action effect, land acquisition reduces the cultivated land area of a single province but increases the CL-TFP of neighboring provinces. In terms of direct effects, the short-term and long-term effects of urban and rural income are both positive on CL-TFP, and the long-term positive effect is significantly greater than the short-term positive effect; the impact of land expropriation area on CL-TFP is negative both in the short term and the long term. As for indirect effects, only the short-term and long-term effects of land acquisition are positive, while that of other significant variables are negative. The policy constraints and social systems affect CL-TFP by the technology effect, scale effect and scope effect, respectively. Therefore, this paper proposes to promote CL-TFP by improving the urbanization land use, agricultural population transfer and optimizing the land use allocation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: