This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In studies of the rhetorical forms present in biblical writings there exists today a certain confusion regarding the way various patterns are identified. Chiasmus should be clearly distinguished from direct, inverted and antithetical parallelism, in order to stress its characteristic focus upon a thematic center or "pivot" about which other elements of the literary unit are developed. Several key passages, from the psalms, epistles, and gospels, are shown to be structured according to the chiastic patterns A B A'or A B C B' A'. By revealing the conceptual center of the passage in question, these examples demonstrate that recognition and analysis of chiasmus is indispensable for a proper understanding of the theological message the biblical writer intended to communicate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Breck (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: