Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates wave transmission and setup in coastal structures, suggesting effective solutions.
This study experimentally investigated the wave transmission and setup characteristics of biomimetic submerged structures as Nature-based Solutions (NbSs) for coastal protection. A non-porous monolithic pillar and a highly porous, multi-branched staghorn coral replica were tested in a 2D flume featuring a 1:20 foreshore slope representative of Kuta Beach, Bali. The results revealed a highly divergent, period-dependent hydrodynamic response. Under short-period waves (T = 0.8 s), attenuation was density dependent; the porous replica gradually dissipates energy through canopy micro-turbulence, yielding transmission coefficients (Kt) ranging from 0.25 to 1.18. Conversely, under long-period waves (T = 1.6 s), the attenuation mechanism shifted to density-independent, depth-induced breaking. This establishes a critical hydrodynamic trade-off: higher wave attenuation (lower Kt) inherently generates a higher coastal wave setup due to momentum transfer. Crucially, while both structures reduced transmission, the internal porosity of the multi-branched replica facilitated sub-surface return flow, effectively capping the maximum normalized wave setup at 0.09. This represents an 18% reduction in setup-induced coastal hazards compared to the monolithic baseline. To facilitate practical engineering design, new empirical equations (R2≈0.80) for predicting Kt were derived, integrating the frontal area index (λf). Ultimately, these findings demonstrate that multi-branched biomimetic structures provide an optimal NbS design, balancing effective wave energy attenuation with the mitigation of secondary setup hazards for vulnerable coastal regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusuf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: