Quantifies risks in pre-licensing architectural design, indicating effective proactive measures.
Pre-licensing architectural design is iterative and cyclical, and linear project management models cannot adequately explain it. This paper presents a decision-support framework that quantifies iteration and delay risks from task-stakeholder interactions through a Design Structure Matrix (DSM)-based model. Using an embedded four-case design, task dependencies and feedback intensities were modelled in a weighted DSM drawing on project logs, revision records, and coordination notes. DSM metrics were combined with past delay impact and revision frequency in a Weighted Scoring Model, yielding Total Risk Scores (TRS) per task and Normalised Risk Scores (NRS) for inter-phase comparison. NRS thresholds, derived from natural distribution gaps, flag high-risk nodes early and inform intervention priorities. Robustness was verified through five-scenario sensitivity analysis (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.866) and a single-variable transferability test on a fifth project (Spearman ρ = 0.977; 80.8% class stability). The framework converts process data into traceable risk indicators for BIM Execution Plans and digital twin environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadir Öz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: