Examines reflexive classification conditions in ontosystematics, highlighting significant methodological objections.
Conditions fixed in advance for a reflexive classification trial in Ontosystematics; contamination declared rather than independence claimed; convicting and acquitting conditions, blockers, a six-outcome space and an undecidability regime registered before the trial is conducted.Version 1.1 adds one methodological prohibition at §15 — the prolepsis control — entered before any gate has closed and before any node has been judged. No convicting or acquitting condition is altered.V1.2 — second printed amendment, 3 August 2026. A formulability objection to C1 is entered at §15, before any gate has closed and before any node has been judged. It is an objection to the trial's own question, printed with the reply the chapter must argue and with the consequence if the reply fails. No convicting or acquitting condition is altered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessio Montaruli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: