Randomized trial confirms the convergence of solutions in positive rational difference equations, indicating important behavior in mathematical analysis.
In Kulenović et al. [Open problems and conjectures: Edited by Gerry Ladas, J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 9(11) (2003), pp. 1053–1056] posed a conjecture asserting that every positive solution of the rational second-order difference equation yn+1=yn(1+yn)2yn(1+yn)+(1+yn−1),n=0,1,…,converges to a finite limit. We confirm this conjecture by deriving a short identity showing that the sign of yn+1−yn is invariant with respect to n, so every positive solution is monotone. A simple estimate then gives an explicit initial-data-dependent upper bound in the increasing case, while the decreasing case is bounded below by positivity. Hence every positive solution converges. In addition, we introduce the auxiliary sequence tn:=yn(1+yn)1+yn−1,which is monotone in the direction opposite to that of yn. It yields nested two-sided enclosures of the limit and an exact invariant-series formula. Writing gn=tn−yn and ρn=tn/(1+tn)2, we prove that In=yn+gn∑j=0∞11+tn+j∏m=0j−1ρn+mis independent of n and satisfies In=L=limk→∞yk. Hence the limiting equilibrium selected by the initial data is determined by the invariant value I0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeraoulia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: