Examines CO2 mobility and trapping in carbonate reservoirs, suggesting topology governs flow behavior.
Reliable prediction of CO 2 storage security and injectivity in carbonate reservoirs is limited by scarce, inconsistent multiphase-flow data and by uncertainty over whether their flow behavior is governed by wettability or pore-network structure. We study a sample from a candidate carbonate storage reservoir, integrating steady-state CO 2 -brine relative permeability measurements at reservoir conditions (8 MPa, 50 ℃) with in situ X-ray microtomography and pore-network modeling to cross-validate macroscopic relative permeability, pore-scale ganglion topology, and displacement mechanisms. We observed low CO 2 relative permeability (maximum 0.30) and strong drainage–imbibition hysteresis, with high residual trapping (63% of initial saturation). In situ topological tracking links this hysteresis to an asymmetry in CO 2 connectivity: drainage coalesces dispersed ganglia into a sample-spanning backbone (normalized Euler characteristic from +5 to -16 mm − 3 ), whereas imbibition dismantles it into isolated clusters (+19 mm − 3 ). Pore-network modeling reproduces the measured relative permeabilities and identifies that snap-off—17% of throat-filling events—effectively fragments the percolating CO 2 network, serving as the controlling disconnection mechanism. Varying the modeled contact angle from water-wet to neutral-wet (θ = 0 ◦ -90 ◦ ) shifts the capillary pressure but leaves relative permeability and the invasion sequence essentially unchanged, showing that pore-network topology, rather than wettability, governs CO 2 mobility, hysteresis, and trapping in this carbonate. These results explain how heterogeneous carbonates can combine low CO 2 mobility with high storage security, and provide relative permeability functions and trapping mechanisms for use in storage forecasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: