Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review compares chitosan and sodium hypochlorite for antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, suggesting chitosan is effective.
Background and Objectives: This study compared the antimicrobial effects of chitosan and sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) at different irrigation solution concentrations. E. faecalis is a persistent pathogen frequently surviving root canal treatment, while sodium hypochlorite remains the current gold-standard irrigation material. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies was conducted using Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed. Evidence certainty was assessed with GRADE. Two outcomes were analyzed: colony-forming units (CFU/mL) and the inhibition rate (IR). Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Results: Of 889 identified records, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. For CFU/mL, the overall effect was −0.28 (95% CI: −1.54 to 0.97). For IR, chitosan concentrations < 1% showed an effect of –7.35 (95% CI: −27.27 to 12.56), while concentrations ≥ 1% showed an effect of −0.90 (95% CI: −19.24 to 17.45). Conclusions: Chitosan demonstrated antimicrobial activity comparable to sodium hypochlorite in vitro, with concentrations above 1% showing enhanced antibacterial effects. However, methodological heterogeneity limits direct comparison, and clinical equivalence cannot be concluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Róna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: