Quasi-experimental study examines how instructional design influences affective learning in Kenyan physics classes, suggesting design is more effective than learning style differentiation.
This study investigated whether learners' VARK learning style preference (Visual, Aural, Read/Write, Kinesthetic, Multimodal) moderates the effect of instructional method on affective learning outcomes in Form Two physics. A quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control-group design was used with a sample of 138 Form Two students drawn from four secondary schools in Nairobi County, Kenya, assigned to an experimental condition taught using Gagné's Nine Events of Instruction (n = 65) and a control condition taught through the conventional lecture method (n = 73). Affective performance was dichotomised into Rank A (higher affective engagement) and Rank B (lower affective engagement) using a Physics Affective Scale, and the association between learning style and affective rank was tested using Fisher's Exact Test with Monte Carlo simulation (138 sampled tables, seed = 508,741,944) because of expected cell-frequency violations. Learning style preference was not significantly associated with affective performance rank within either instructional method or in the combined sample (all p > .10). However, the two instructional methods produced starkly different affective outcome distributions: 95.4% of learners under Gagné's Nine Events attained Rank A, compared with only 20.5% under the conventional method. The findings suggest that, within the parameters of this study, instructional design was a stronger determinant of learners' affective engagement than individual learning style preference, with implications for how Kenyan physics teachers allocate instructional effort between method-level design and style-based differentiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogogo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: