Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The performance of a capillary barrier cover as a cover system is affected by the ability of the capillary barrier to store water. To increase the water storage of a capillary barrier cover, the dual capillary barrier (DCB) concept is proposed. The objective of this paper is to investigate the water storage of the proposed DCB as compared to the storage of a traditional single capillary barrier (SCB). The investigation is conducted using two one-dimensional infiltration column tests under different rainfall conditions. The results show that a DCB stores more water as compared to SCB. The results show that the fine-grained layers of a DCB have higher volumetric water contents during drainage as compared to that of the fine-grained layer of an SCB. The higher volumetric water content is caused by the fact that the thickness of the layers in a DCB corresponds to a pore-water pressure head range where the material has the highest volumetric water content. In addition, a slower drainage rate is resulted from additional layering in a DCB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harnas et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: