Let us adopt the classical point of view that a theory of games is a description of “rational” behavior. Consequently, equipped with a book entitled “Theory of Games,” any individual in any strategic situation need only consult the book to make a “rational” decision. One of the questions to address in this context is indeed whether or not strategies other than those provided by backward induction can ever appear in such a book. In offering an answer, we shall also explore the logical limits within which any “Theory of Games” must operate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip J. Reny (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: