Why the study?
Treatment decisions for recombinant human growth hormone in partial growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature are complicated by an ambiguous platform of definitions, blurry distinctions, and outside pressures.
Highlights the complexities and the need for shared decision-making when considering recombinant human growth hormone treatment for partial growth hormone deficiency and idiopathic short stature.
Treatment decisions for rhGH in GHD and ISS remain nuanced; leaves open standardized criteria and long-term outcome data.
Worrisome growth can be a sign of underlying pathology but usually reflects healthy variation. It is often recognized through short stature, which is defined by arbitrarily separating height, a physical trait on a continuum, into "normal" and "abnormal." In some cases of worrisome growth, recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) treatment is indicated to hasten growth/increase height. This review addresses the two most frequently treated indications for rhGH, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS). A review of worrisome growth itself, of the history of GH treatment, of the blurry line between partial GHD and ISS, of the GH stakeholders, and of the outside pressures involved in these cases demonstrates the ambiguous platform upon which treatment decisions are made. The rhGH treatment decision process can be examined further by considering the three most impactful factors on parental height-related medical decision-making: treatment characteristics, child health, and psychosocial function. While it is important to note that treatment for classical GHD is uncontroversial and supported, treatment decisions for partial GHD and ISS are more complicated and require careful evaluation of both patient needs and the supporting evidence. As the rhGH community grows, physicians, parents, and patients are encouraged to engage in a shared decision-making process to navigate the many challenges facing the GH field. Although this review addresses GHD and ISS specifically, the issues discussed are often applicable to pediatrics as a whole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halas et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: