Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The valence-bond method is discussed and is compared with the molecular-orbital SCF method from a computational standpoint. A procedure is outlined for performing valence-bond calculations making use of the Prosser and Hagstrom biorthogonalization technique to evaluate the cofactors required when evaluating the energy using Löwdin's formula. A minimal basis set (STO) valence-bond calculation on BeH2 including all possible configurations which do not involve excitation of the Be 1s electrons is reported. This is compared with a molecular-orbital calculation using the same basis set. A valence-bond wavefunction neglecting ionic configurations is shown to give an energy better than the molecular-orbital wavefunction and almost as good as a ``full'' valence-bond calculation. The perfect pairing and Craig and Thirunamachandran's resonance approximation are examined. A scheme for performing semiempirical valence-bond calculations analogous to the Pople—Santry—Segal CNDO/2 MO method is described. Ionic configurations cannot be neglected in this ZDO approximation, but this is not a serious limitation. The method is very simple computationally. Hybrid and localized orbitals can be used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maclagan et al. (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: