Why the study?
Is the subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD) safe and effective in patients with complex congenital heart disease?
Is the subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD) safe and effective in patients with complex congenital heart disease?
S-ICD appears to be a safe and effective option for patients with complex congenital heart disease, with a low rate of complications over long-term follow-up.
Small case series suggests S-ICD feasibility in complex CHD; leaves open need for larger prospective studies on safety and efficacy.
AIM: To describe the long-term follow-up of patients with complex congenital heart disease who underwent subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator (S-ICD), focusing on local complications, appropriate and inappropriate shocks. METHODS: Patients with complex congenital heart disease underwent S-ICD implant in two centers with the conventional technique. Data at follow-up were retrieved from clinical notes and institutional database. RESULTS: Eight patients were implanted in two centres between 2010 and 2016. Median age at implant was 37.5 years (range 13-57). All patients who were deemed suitable for S-ICD implant passed the pre-procedural screening. Three patients were previously implanted with a anti-bradycardia device, one of whom with CRT. In one patient the device was explanted due to local infection. During the total median follow-up of 874 d, one patient had an appropriate and one inappropriate shock triggered by fast atrial tachycardia. None of the patients had inappropriate shocks secondary to T wave oversensing or electrical interference with anti- bradycardia devices. CONCLUSION: S-ICD appears to be effective and safe in patients with complex congenital heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrero et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: