Why the study?
Residual neurological impairment and emotional factors influence post-stroke participation, but the mediating impact of anxiety across survivors with and without post-stroke depressive symptoms was unclear.
Anxiety mediates the negative impact of residual neurological impairment on participation in stroke survivors with depressive symptoms, highlighting the need to address both anxiety and depression to improve post-stroke outcomes.
Anxiety screening may aid participation post-stroke; leaves open whether mediation generalizes beyond this small observational sample.
Previous research has reported that residual neurological impairment and emotional factors play a role in regaining successful participation post-stroke. The objective of this study was to investigate the mediating impact of anxiety on the association between residual neurological impairment and participation in survivors with and without post-stroke depressive symptoms. Participants (N = 79) were classified into 2 categories, those with post-stroke depressive symptoms (N = 40) and those without post-stroke depressive symptoms (N = 39). Variables measured in this study: residual neurological impairment (NIH Stroke Scale Score), participation (Reintegration to Normal Living Index), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and trait anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). A regression-based mediation analysis was conducted for each group of participants. The majority of participants had some level of anxiety. Residual neurological impairment predicted participation in stroke survivors both with (β = -.45, p = .003) and without (β = -.45, p = .004) post-stroke depressive symptoms. Anxiety mediated this relationship in participants with depressive symptoms (β = -.19, 95% CI = -.361 ∼ -.049), but not in participants without depressive symptoms (β = -.18, 95% CI = -.014 ∼ .378). Depressive and anxious symptoms should both be addressed to best facilitate participation by stroke survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randolph et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: