Why the study?
It has been posited that traits shared by nonclinical individuals and psychiatric patients could help explain the pathogenesis of compulsive decision-making characterized by cognitive inflexibility and excessive reward sensitivity.
Does cognitive inflexibility predispose nonclinical individuals to poor choices and hyper-reactivity to reward?
Does cognitive inflexibility predispose nonclinical individuals to poor choices and hyper-reactivity to reward?
Cognitive inflexibility is associated with physiological reward sensitivity (cardiac acceleration) in a nonclinical population, suggesting a transdiagnostic predisposing factor for compulsive behaviors.
May link cognitive inflexibility to reward-driven poor choices in nonclinical samples; hypothesis-generating for compulsive decision-making pathogenesis.
Background: In psychopathologies characterized by compulsive decision-making, core impairments include cognitive inflexibility and excessive sensitivity to rewards. It has been posited that traits shared by nonclinical individuals and psychiatric patients could help explain the pathogenesis of compulsive decision-making. Methods: To investigate whether cognitive inflexibility predisposes nonclinical individuals to poor choices and hyper-reactivity to reward, we recruited people with high and low scores for cognitive persistence and used the Iowa Gambling Task to assess decision-making and cardiac reactivity to monetary gains/losses. Results: As is frequently observed in psychophysiological research, the data indicated discrepancies among self-reports, behavior, and physiology. Cognitive inflexibility was not related to worse performance; however, monetary gains, in line with the literature, prompted marked cardiac accelerations. Consistent with our research goal, only inflexible participants showed large cardiac accelerations during the largest monetary wins. Discussion: Taken together, the data confirm an association between cognitive persistence and physiological reward sensitivity in a nonclinical population. The findings are in line with recent theories on the development of compulsive behaviors that consider cognitive inflexibility as a transdiagnostic impairment and predisposing factor for excessive reactivity to rewards, and might act both as a preexisting individual trait and drug-induced deficit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mata et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: