Why the study?
What are the clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of porcine heterograft mitral valve replacements?
What are the clinical and haemodynamic outcomes of porcine heterograft mitral valve replacements?
Porcine heterograft mitral valve replacements generally provide good clinical results and competent valves, with haemodynamic gradients inversely related to prosthesis size.
Case-level hemodynamics indicate acceptable mitral gradients; leaves open durability and outcomes in larger cohorts.
Clinical and haemodynamic assessment has been made of 24 patients with porcine hetero- graft mitral valve replacements. Twenty patients had a good clinical result and were studied electively and 4 patients had persistent symptoms caused either by poor left ventricular function, aortic para- prosthetic regurgitation, mitral paraprosthetic regurgitation, or impaired left ventricular function with a rather small mitral valve area of 1-4 cm2. The mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 17-8 1-2 mmHg and the mean mitral valve diastolic gradient was 5 9 1.0 mmHg. The larger prostheses had the smaller gradients. The average mitral valve area was 3-2 cm2 for 35 mm valves, 2-8 cm2 for 33 mm valves, 2-1 cm2 for 31 mm valves, and 2-3 cm2 for 29 mm valves. Two patients showed significant mitral regurgitation on left ventricular cineangiography but in the remainder the valves were competent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotter et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: