Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ground states of the F(3)(-) and H(3)(-) hypercoordinated anions are investigated and analyzed in terms of valence bond structures by means of the breathing-orbital valence bond method. While H(3)(-) is described reasonably well as the interplay of two major Lewis structures, H(2) + H(-) and its mirror image, the description of F(3)(-) requires a further structure, of the type F(*)F(-)F(*), which strongly stabilizes the trimer relative to the dissociation products, and endows the F(3)(-) ground state with a predominant three-electron bond character. It follows that the simple picture that is closest to the true nature of F(3)(-) is a resonating combination of F(2)(-) + F(*) and its mirror image. This peculiarity of the F(3)(-) electronic structure is at the origin of its preferred dissociation channel leading to F(2)(-) + F(*) rather than to the most stable product F(2) + F(-), at high collision energies. The three-electron bond character of F(3)(-) is also the root cause for the failure of the Hartree-Fock and density functional methods for this species, and for its strong tendency to artifactual symmetry-breaking. As an alternative to the Rundle-Pimentel model, the origins of the stability of F(3)(-), as opposed to the instability of H(3)(-), CH(5)(-), and other S(N)2 transition states, are analyzed in the framework of valence bond state correlation diagrams [Shaik, S.; Shurki, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 586]. It is found that a fundamental factor of stability for X(3)(-) is the presence of lone pairs on the X fragment. The explanation carries over to other trihalide anions, and to isoelectronic 22-valence electron hypercoordinated anions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braı̈da et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: