Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A mathematical model of the hormonal changes during the pituitary-ovarian cycle has been developed based on the previous model of Bogumil et al. Our model incorporates the following distinctive features: 1) discontinuous pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), with regulation of its production rate dependent on both the size and frequency of pulsations; 2) the midcycle LH surge (and FSH surge) are triggered by a significant fall of serum estradiol (E2) after E2 has been maintained at a high level for a critical period of time; 3) the magnitude of the LH and FSH surges depends on the dose and duration of E2 in the antecedent follicular phase; 4) the sensitivity of the pituitary to E2 feedback changes during the follicular phase, i.e., low E2 during the early follicular phase provides a stimulus for increased LH release in the mid-follicular phase; 5) effects of LH and FSH on the ovary are manifested only after an arbitrary delay; 6) LH is metabolized in a two compartment rather than a single compartment system. The model displays an ideal or “limit” cycle similar to that of the Bogumil model, with some notable exceptions: 1) the midcycle FSH and LH peaks are coincident; 2) the midcycle FSH peak reaches values higher than those observed in the early follicular phase; 3) LH values do not fall progressively during the follicular phase; 4) the model responds appropriately to simulated infusion of estradiol for 36 h commencing on day 2 or day 8 of the follicular phase, consistent with recent physiological studies. These studies indicate that the Bogumil-Vande Wiele model is a suitable basis for further analysis of the control mechanisms of the menstrual cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: