Key result
A machine learning prediction model using pre-procedural non-invasive variables successfully identified patients at high risk for progression to permanent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation (log-rank p < 0.001).
Why the study?
To develop a prediction model for AF progression and test whether machine learning could reproduce prediction power in an independent cohort using pre-procedural non-invasive variables alone.
Can a machine learning model using non-invasive variables accurately predict progression to permanent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=1,872)
Yes
Can a machine learning model using non-invasive variables accurately predict progression to permanent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.796 (95% CI 0.753-0.838)
A machine learning model using only non-invasive variables can successfully identify patients at high risk of progressing to permanent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation.
May inform post-ablation risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Introduction We developed a prediction model for atrial fibrillation (AF) progression and tested whether machine learning (ML) could reproduce the prediction power in an independent cohort using pre-procedural non-invasive variables alone. Methods Cohort 1 included 1,214 patients and cohort 2, 658, and all underwent AF catheter ablation (AFCA). AF progression to permanent AF was defined as sustained AF despite repeat AFCA or cardioversion under antiarrhythmic drugs. We developed a risk stratification model for AF progression (STAAR score) and stratified cohort 1 into three groups. We also developed an ML-prediction model to classify three STAAR risk groups without invasive parameters and validated the risk score in cohort 2. Results The STAAR score consisted of a stroke (2 points, p = 0.003), persistent AF (1 point, p = 0.049), left atrial (LA) dimension ≥43 mm (1 point, p = 0.010), LA voltage <1.109 mV (2 points, p = 0.004), and PR interval ≥196 ms (1 point, p = 0.001), based on multivariate Cox analyses, and it had a good discriminative power for progression to permanent AF [area under curve (AUC) 0.796, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.753–0.838]. The ML prediction model calculated the risk for AF progression without invasive variables and achieved excellent risk stratification: AUC 0.935 for low-risk groups (score = 0), AUC 0.855 for intermediate-risk groups (score 1–3), and AUC 0.965 for high-risk groups (score ≥ 4) in cohort 1. The ML model successfully predicted the high-risk group for AF progression in cohort 2 (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusions The ML-prediction model successfully classified the high-risk patients who will progress to permanent AF after AFCA without invasive variables but has a limited discrimination power for the intermediate-risk group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=1,872). Machine learning-prediction model vs. Low and intermediate risk groups was evaluated on Progression to permanent AF (STAAR score discrimination) (AUC 0.796, 95% CI 0.753-0.838). A machine learning prediction model using pre-procedural non-invasive variables successfully identified patients at high risk for progression to permanent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation (log-rank p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: