Key result
Implantable loop recorders in children were associated with symptom resolution in 44.1% of patients and successfully determined cardiac rhythm in the 55.9% who experienced symptom recurrence.
Why the study?
Does the implantable loop recorder improve rhythm diagnosis in children with unexplained syncope, seizures, or palpitations?
Observational (n=34)
No
Does the implantable loop recorder improve rhythm diagnosis in children with unexplained syncope, seizures, or palpitations?
The implantable loop recorder is effective for diagnosing arrhythmias during symptom recurrence in children, though it carries a notable complication rate requiring device removal.
May support ILR use for symptom evaluation in children; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm benefit and guide practice.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use of the implantable loop recorder in children. SETTING: Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK. METHOD: Retrospective study of children who had an implantable loop recorder between September 1998 and October 2005. RESULTS: 38 devices were implanted in 34 children. Median age at implantation 11.3 years (range 1.8-17.6); median follow-up period 15 months (range 2-58). The main presenting complaint was syncope in 26 (76.5%), seizures in 6 (17.6%) and palpitations in 2 (5.9%). After implantation, 19 (55.9%) patients had symptom recurrence. Of these, 11 were shown to have sinus rhythm during symptoms and 8 had an abnormal ECG. Four patients had asystole >3 seconds and were diagnosed with reflex asystolic syncope; 2 had polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. One patient who already had a diagnosis of long QT syndrome was shown to have ventricular ectopy during symptoms and beta-blockers were increased. One patient had transient complete heart block during symptoms but refused a pacemaker. In almost half the patients (44.1%), symptoms resolved after implantation. Complications requiring removal of the device occurred in 6 (15.8%) implants. CONCLUSIONS: In children with syncope and palpitations, the implantable loop recorder appears to be an excellent method of effecting a "cure" in almost 50% of subjects. For those who remain symptomatic, it is successful in determining cardiac rhythm during symptoms, but the complication rate in children may be higher than that of adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeung et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Syncope, seizures, and palpitations (n=34). Implantable loop recorder was evaluated on Symptom recurrence. Implantable loop recorders in children were associated with symptom resolution in 44.1% of patients and successfully determined cardiac rhythm in the 55.9% who experienced symptom recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: