Physicians must interpret coronary angiography with caution and skepticism. Coronary angiography is considered the gold standard for defining coronary artery anatomy, diagnosing coronary artery disease, and guiding intervention. However, it does not provide functional information and may be misleading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Sullivan et al. (1961) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: