Derivation of characteristic physioclimatic regions through density-based spatial clustering of high-dimensional data

Physioclimatic regions are homogeneous geospatial entities that exhibit similar characteristics in both climatic conditions and the physiographic environment. They provide a foundation for a broad range of analyses in earth system sciences that are conditional on the prevailing climatological properties shaping geographical areas. However, delineating such regions is challenging due to high-dimensional input data and nonlinear processes in nature. We introduce a nonparametric clustering methodology to derive geospatial clusters with similar physioclimatic attributes, using a comprehensive dataset of climatological and geomorphometric indices from Austria. Our analysis workflow includes (1) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for linear dimension reduction, (2) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) for nonlinear dimension reduction, (3) Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) for clustering and (4) random forest for feature importance assessment. Results show both agreement and differences compared to reference classification, thereby highlighting the need for quantitative performance evaluation and synoptic plausibility assessment. Findings include the identification of two characteristic clusters for inneralpine valleys in Western Austria and interfluves in the Styrian basin. This workflow offers a blueprint for delineating consistent geospatial regions for various applications. Clusters obtained with this approach may assist in unearthing new perspectives on regionalisation, provide new insights in the underlying characteristics determining these regions, and thus aid in the understanding of complex environmental patterns. • Geospatial clusters are derived from gridded climate and terrain data. • Flexible nonparametric methods are used in a sequential workflow. • Steps include dimensionality reduction, clustering, feature importance assessment. • Evaluation is performed against quantitative metrics and synoptic plausibility. • Findings complement reference methods, providing new perspectives and insights.