Key result
The combination of CTA and CTPI improved the sensitivity of detecting pulmonary emboli to 87% compared to 59% with CTA alone.
Why the study?
Does the addition of CT perfusion imaging to CT angiography improve the detection of pulmonary emboli in a porcine model?
Does the addition of CT perfusion imaging to CT angiography improve the detection of pulmonary emboli in a porcine model?
CT perfusion imaging obtained by digital subtraction enhances the diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary embolism detection compared to CTA alone in a porcine model.
Hypothesis-generating in porcine PE model; clinical adoption of CTA-CTPI requires prospective human validation.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We assess the value of computed tomography perfusion image (CTPI) obtained by postprocessing the CT data in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. METHODS: An experimental pulmonary embolism model was made in 6 pigs by injecting 2 types of emboli into the pulmonary arteries. For each pig, 5 type-A (diameter 3.5 x 8 mm) and 5 type-B (diameter 2.5 x 6 mm) emboli were injected through a catheter with the distal tip located in the inflow tract of the right atrium. After obtaining precontrast and postcontrast CT data during a single breath-hold using a 4-slice multidetector CT, perfusion images were generated by data subtraction. Approximately 150 to 180 mL of contrast material was injected at an injection rate of 6 mL/s to obtain postcontrast CT. Three independent observers twice analyzed CT images for the presence of emboli: once with postcontrast CT scans (CT angiography: CTA) alone and again with both CTA and CTPI. The locations of the emboli in the pulmonary arteries were confirmed by examining the killed porcine lungs. RESULTS: The sensitivity and positive predictive value in the detection of pulmonary emboli with CTA alone were 59% (106/180) and 87% (106/122), respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive value with both CTA and CTPI were 87% (156/180) and 85% (156/184), respectively. For type-A emboli, the sensitivity with both CTA and CTPI (76/90, 85%) was better than that with CTA alone (63/90, 70%) (P < 0.001). For type-B emboli, the sensitivity with both CTA and CTPI (80/90, 89%) was also better than that of CTA alone (43/90, 48%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CTPI could be obtained using digital subtraction of the CT data. It appeared to be an adjunct in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary embolism, particularly when detecting small pulmonary emboli.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2004) studied Pulmonary embolism (n=6). CTA and CTPI (computed tomography perfusion image) vs. CTA alone was evaluated on Sensitivity in the detection of pulmonary emboli. The combination of CTA and CTPI improved the sensitivity of detecting pulmonary emboli to 87% compared to 59% with CTA alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: