Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies released its new Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D report on November 30, 2010 (IOM, 2011), which is summarized in Ross et al. (2010). The IOM report found that the only health benefit of vitamin D supported by the rigorous scientific studies they reviewed was for the bones. The report set recommended dietary allowances of 600 IU/day for those aged 1–70 years and 800 IU/day for those aged 71 or older, under conditions of minimal sun exposure. It also stated that a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level of 20 ng/ml was adequate. However, the authors noted that no adverse effects such as hypercalcemia or acute toxicity had been documented for oral intakes of up to 10,000 IU/day for adults; regardless, they set the upper-level intake at between 1,000 IU/day for infants (aged 0–6 months) and 4,000 IU/day for those older than 9 years. While this report is a step forward, it is disappointing that no nonbony benefits emerged from this review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William B. Grant (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: