Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and clinical implications of extra-coronary findings in a large cohort of patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 3295 consecutive CCTA examinations at a single tertiary center. Radiology reports were reviewed for potentially significant extra-coronary findings. Three-year follow-up evaluation was performed via hospital records. Prevalences of confirmed significant findings were determined and extrapolated to patients lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Extra-coronary findings were reported in 92.7% (3053/3295) of patients. Potentially significant non-cardiovascular findings were found in 25.3% (833/3295), including potentially malignant findings in 8.5% (281/3295) and significant non-malignant findings in 19.3% (637/3295). Among patients with potentially malignant findings, 40.2% (113/281) underwent follow-up, with confirmed malignancy in 28.3% (32/113). Extrapolation suggests a malignancy prevalence of up to 2.4% (95% CI: 1.8-3.2%) within the CCTA field of view, with a minimum of 1.0% if all patients lost to follow-up were assumed to have no malignancy. The most frequent significant non-malignant finding was pulmonary emphysema (10.7%; 352/3295), with extrapolated prevalence rates of 4.2% (95% CI: 2.6-5.9% for COPD and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.8-3.4%) for asthma or obstructive sleep apnea. Liver steatosis was present in 4.5% (147/3295), with an estimated prevalence of 3.1% (95% CI: 1.6-4.2%) for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.3-2.9%) for alcohol-related liver disease. CONCLUSION: Extra-coronary findings are common in CCTA and carry important clinical implications. Careful management is necessary, and additional screening protocols may benefit high-risk patients. KEY POINTS: Question How frequently do extra-coronary findings occur in coronary CT angiography, and what is their clinical impact in patients undergoing cardiac evaluation? Findings Clinically significant extra-coronary non-cardiovascular findings were identified in 25.3% of patients, including unsuspected malignancies and relevant pulmonary and hepatic comorbidities. Clinical relevance Extra-coronary findings on coronary CT angiography are common and often clinically relevant, warranting structured assessment to support timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gloor et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: