Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this study was to examine impact of non-realistic and realistic storybooks on kindergarteners’ storybook listening comprehension. One hundred and three kindergarteners ranging in age from 49 to 71 months, with a mean age of 62.08 months (SD = 4.97) from three public kindergartens participated in the study. Participants listened to non-realistic and realistic storybooks and responded to questions on character recall, event recall, plot, reasoning, and problem-solving. One week later, children responded to the same questions in order to measure the impact of persistency in learning. The characters in the non-realistic storybook were animals. This was the sole difference between the two types of storybooks. Findings from both measurements (post-test and follow-up test) revealed statistically significant differences in storybook comprehension in favour of the realistic group. Investigators concluded that realistic storybooks make significant contribution to children’s storybook comprehension; therefore, the use of realistic storybooks in early childhood should increase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kotaman et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: