Key result
PPG-based machine learning model identifies low intraoperative cardiac index with ~88% accuracy.
Why the study?
The gold standard thermodilution method for measuring cardiac output is invasive, prompting the search for non-invasive alternatives.
Does a machine learning model using non-invasive finger photoplethysmography accurately classify cardiac index into low and non-low categories compared to invasive pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Observational (n=67)
No
Does a machine learning model using non-invasive finger photoplethysmography accurately classify cardiac index into low and non-low categories compared to invasive pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
A CatBoost machine learning algorithm analyzing single-channel finger photoplethysmography waveforms can non-invasively classify low versus non-low cardiac index states with 87.57% accuracy during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Background/Objectives: Hemodynamic monitoring is crucial for managing critically ill patients and those undergoing major surgeries. Cardiac output (CO) is an essential marker for diagnosing hemodynamic deterioration and guiding interventions. The gold standard thermodilution method for measuring CO is invasive, prompting a search for non-invasive alternatives. This pilot study aimed to develop a non-invasive algorithm for classifying the cardiac index (CI) into low and non-low categories using finger photoplethysmography (PPG) and a machine learning model. Methods: PPG and continuous thermodilution CO data were collected from patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The dataset underwent preprocessing, and features were extracted and selected using the Relief algorithm. A CatBoost machine learning model was trained and evaluated using a validation and testing phase approach. Results: The developed model achieved an accuracy of 89.42% in the validation phase and 87.57% in the testing phase. Performance was balanced across low and non-low CO categories, demonstrating robust classification capabilities. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning and non-invasive PPG for accurate CO classification. The proposed method could enhance patient safety and comfort in critical care and surgical settings by providing a non-invasive alternative to traditional invasive CO monitoring techniques. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger, diverse patient populations and clinical scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pastor et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) surgery (n=67). CatBoost machine learning algorithm using finger photoplethysmography (PPG) signals vs. Continuous pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution cardiac output measurement was evaluated on Accuracy in classifying cardiac index into low (<= 2 L/min/m2) and non-low (> 2 L/min/m2) categories in the testing phase. The PPG-based CatBoost machine learning model classified intraoperative cardiac index into low and non-low categories with 87.57% testing accuracy compared to pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: