OVERVIEW:The use of concurrent and sequential engineering for new product development was compared in one technology-intensive company. Overall, concurrent engineering (CE) led to shorter development time and better performance. The study also established a framework for the systematic implementation of CE, involving process, people, tools and technology, metrics, organizational support, buy-in, and benefits and barriers to success. Among those barriers: lack of business unit and top management support, difficulty setting requirements at the concept stage, and lack of early involvement by Marketing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhuiyan et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: