Key result
Quantitative ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis showed no significant differences between subcostal and intercostal scan views, making the two projections interchangeable.
Why the study?
NAFLD is a growing public health issue where identifying steatosis severity is important, but the effect of different US scan views on quantitative steatosis assessment required evaluation.
Does the ultrasound scan projection (subcostal vs intercostal) affect the quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD?
Observational (n=214)
Does the ultrasound scan projection (subcostal vs intercostal) affect the quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD?
Subcostal and intercostal ultrasound scans are interchangeable for the quantitative assessment of moderate and severe hepatic steatosis.
May support interchangeable ultrasound views for hepatic steatosis; leaves open validation in larger, prospective cohorts.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming a global public health issue and the identification of the steatosis severity is very important for the patients' health. Ultrasound (US) images of 214 patients were acquired in two different scan views (subcostal and intercostal). A classification of the level of steatosis was made by a qualitative evaluation of the liver ultrasound images. Furthermore, an US image processing algorithm provided quantitative parameters (hepatic-renal ratio (HR) and Steato-score) designed to quantifying the fatty liver content. The aim of the study is to evaluate the differences in the assessment of hepatic steatosis acquiring and processing different US scan views. No significant differences were obtained calculating the HR and the Steato-score parameters, not even with the classification of patients on the basis of body mass index (BMI) and of different classes of steatosis severity. Significant differences between the two parameters were found only for patients with absence or mild level of steatosis. These results show that the two different scan projections do not greatly affect HR and the Steato-score assessment. Accordingly, the US-based steatosis assessment is independent from the view of the acquisitions, thus making the subcostal and intercostal scans interchangeable, especially for patients with moderate and severe steatosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosa et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (n=214). Subcostal ultrasound scan view vs. Intercostal ultrasound scan view was evaluated on Differences in hepatic-renal ratio (HR) and Steato-score. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis showed no significant differences between subcostal and intercostal scan views, making the two projections interchangeable.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: