Key result
Anomalous papillary muscle insertion had a prevalence of 0.9% in systematically examined hearts, and subjects dying of natural causes had significantly heavier hearts (455 g vs 330 g; p<0.05).
Why the study?
Interpreting isolated anomalous papillary muscle insertion into the anterior mitral valve leaflet is challenging at autopsy because significant LVOT obstruction is dynamic.
Observational (n=20)
Anomalous papillary muscle insertion is a rare autopsy finding (0.9% prevalence) that does not inherently imply significant pathology, though it may be associated with heavier hearts in natural deaths.
Anomalous papillary muscle (APM) insertion into the anterior mitral valve leaflet is often associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) but is reported in other cases as a rare finding. Mere presence does not strictly imply hemodynamic disturbance, and several types exist, with various impacts on left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. The interpretation of isolated anomaly is challenging at autopsy because significant LVOT obstruction is dynamic. We analyzed autopsy cases with APM regarding the site of PM insertion and origin, number of PM bellies, anomalous insertions, heart weight, left ventricle (LV) thickness, LV endocardial fibrosis, subjects' age, sex, cause, and manner of death. A total of 20 cases were identified. Fourteen were identified incidentally, while in 670 systematically examined hearts, the APM was identified in six cases, indicating a prevalence of 0.9%. In eight cases, the manner of death was natural (one case with HCM), and in 12 non-natural. Type II anomaly of PM was most frequent (n = 8), followed by Type III (n = 7) and Type I (n = 5). Subjects who died of natural causes were significantly older and had heavier hearts (median 455 g vs. 330 g; p < 0.05) without difference in LV thickness (median 16 mm vs. 15 mm; p > 0.05). Histology performed in four cases showed a pattern of direct insertion of cardiomyocytes into the leaflet's thick fibrous tissue with a narrow overlapping zone. The APM is rare, can be easily overlooked, and does not imply significant pathology per se. We discussed proper assessment of the significance of this anomaly at autopsy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leković et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Anomalous papillary muscle insertion (n=20). Anomalous papillary muscle insertion was evaluated on Prevalence and morphological characteristics of anomalous papillary muscle insertion. Anomalous papillary muscle insertion had a prevalence of 0.9% in systematically examined hearts, and subjects dying of natural causes had significantly heavier hearts (455 g vs 330 g; p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: