A Ru(II) complex ( Ru ) containing as ligands a tridentate 4‘-p-tolyl-2,2‘:6‘,2‘‘-terpyridine (ttpy) and a tridentate 2,6-bis(4‘-phenyl-2‘-quinolyl)pyridine (bpqpy) has been covalently linked to a porphyrin module ( PH 2 ) to obtain a PH 2 − Ru dyad. The corresponding PZn − Ru dyad has then been obtained by metalation of the free base porphyrin with Zn(II) acetate. The photoinduced processes which occur on excitation of the PH 2 − Ru and PZn − Ru dyads, as well as of the PH 2 and PZn porphyrin units and the [Ru(ttpy)(bpqpy)] 2+ model compound Ru, have been investigated in butyronitrile rigid matrix at 77 K and fluid solution at 295 K. In both dyads at low temperature, the lowest singlet excited state of the porphyrin moiety (S 1 ) is quenched by energy transfer to give the triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer excited state of the Ru complex ( 3 MLCT) which, in its turn, is quenched by energy transfer to yield the triplet excited state of the porphyrin moiety (T 1 ). At room temperature, a charge-transfer (CT) excited state corresponding to the transfer of an electron from the porphyrin moiety to the Ru-based moiety comes into play. For the PZn − Ru dyad, where the CT state lies below the S 1 excited state of the porphyrin moiety, the deactivation of S 1 ( k ≥ 5 × 10 10 s -1 ) occurs mainly by electron transfer to give the CT level that then deactivates to the T 1 excited state of the porphyrin moiety (100% efficiency; k = 9.3 × 10 9 s -1 ). Since the T 1 level is intrinsically long lived (τ ∼ 210 μs), its deactivation occurs essentially via an activated process through the upper lying CT level ( k = 5.7 × 10 6 s -1 ). The 3 MLCT excited state of the Ru-based moiety directly formed by light absorption appears to decay unperturbed with its intrinsic lifetime ( k = 1.1 × 10 10 s -1 ). In the case of the PH 2 − Ru dyad, the CT level lies slightly above S 1 . As a consequence, only a fraction (ca. 30%) of the S 1 excited states are quenched by electron transfer, the remaining part being quenched by energy transfer to give the 3 MLCT excited state of the Ru-based moiety. Deactivation of the CT state leads to the formation of T 1 ( k = 8.7 × 10 9 s -1 ), whereas the 3 MLCT excited state undergoes unperturbed deactivation ( k = 1.2 × 10 10 s -1 ) directly to the ground state. For the latter dyad, the T 1 excited state is very long lived (280 μs) since deactivation via the upper lying CT level is precluded for energetic reasons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flamigni et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: