The effects of credit policy and fertilizer subsidy on farmers' input choices, production, and income are examined with a multiseason decision‐making model. Stochastic production technology, risk‐neutral and risk‐averse decision rules, short‐term savings/consumption behavior, and a dual financial market are considered. Results indicate the risk‐neutral rule is more consistent with actual choices than risk‐averse rules. Estimated yields increased 21% to 30% from joint credit and fertilizer subsidies. Benefits are greater on irrigated than on rainfed farms. A substantial default rate in the institutional market reduces credit program benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosegrant et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: