Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrocatalytic N 2 reduction to ammonia has recently attracted a great deal of interest as a possible renewable energy-driven alternative to the Haber–Bosch process. However, the detection of NH 3 after attempting electrocatalytic reduction of N 2 can be hampered by low NH 3 yields, ambient NH 3 contamination, and the need for multistep chemical separation of NH 3 from the electrolyte. Herein, we report a frequency-selective pulse nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method and quantify the efficacy of this method to measure the concentration of NH 3 (present in the assay as NH 4 + ) in an electrolyte after electrocatalysis. This NMR method was demonstrated to be effective in a variety of nondeuterated, nonaqueous and aqueous electrolytes, and did not require the separation of NH 3 from the electrolyte. NH 3 sensitivity down to 1 μM was readily achieved with isotopic and chemical specificity. Compatible electrolytes and solvents included ethanol, tetrahydrofuran, dimethyl sulfoxide, acetonitrile, propylene carbonate, diethyl either, hexanes, and water. The efficacy of the commonly employed Berthelot method was also quantified and compared to the NMR method in a range of nonaqueous and aqueous electrolytes, including ethanol, THF, propylene carbonate, and water.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nielander et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: