Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To study the effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on metabolic control and well-being in patients with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Efficacy, safety and interference with everyday life associated with CSII were studied retrospectively in 138 diabetic patients from the Veneto region treated for 7.4 +/- 0.4 years. RESULTS: Glycosylated haemoglobin decreased during the first year of CSII from 9.3 +/- 0.2% to 7.9 +/- 0.1% (P < 0.0001), and then remained unchanged. Serious hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.31 +/- 0.07/year to 0.09 +/- 0.02/year (P < 0.003), as did ketoacidosis (from 0.41 +/- 0.12/year to 0.11 +/- 0.03/year, P < 0.013). During the first year of therapy daily insulin requirement decreased from 49 +/- 1 to 42 +/- 2 U/day (P < 0.0001) and did not change thereafter. The number of out-patient consultations and hospital admissions per year also decreased significantly. CSII was associated with a progressive increase of body weight (P < 0.05) and with 0.2 +/- 0.04 infections/patient per year at the infusion site. Infection was rated as mild in 72%, moderate in 18%, severe in 10%. Patients reported that CSII improved metabolic control (71%), sense of well-being (41%), and allowed more freedom (40%). Quality of life, assessed using the DQOL, after 7 years of CSII was rated as good by patients (score of 73.0 +/- 1.8 on a scale from 0 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis suggests that CSII improves metabolic control in Type 1 diabetic patients, reduces hypoglycaemic and ketoacidotic events, is well accepted, allows a good quality of life and decreases out-patient consultations and hospital admissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruttomesso et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: