Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
in SVF, yet seeding efficiency was only improved on MSC-derived ECM. Regardless of ECM source, SVF deposited over 8- and 1.3-fold more calcium compared to TCP and collagen-coated controls, respectively. Flow cytometry confirmed that SVF cultured on ECM retained CD31 and CD34 positive cell populations better than TCP. After depleting accessory cells, ASCs deposited significantly less calcium compared to donor-matched SVF. This function was partially restored in the presence of MSC-derived ECM when donor-matched endothelial cells (ECs) were added in an ASC/EC co-culture, confirming a role for ECs in osteogenic differentiation. These findings support the use of cell-derived ECM as a means to promote cell retention and osteogenic differentiation of SVF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harvestine et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: