Key result
Among 318 patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with the EmboTrap device, in-hospital mortality was 10.7% and the intracranial hemorrhage rate was 16.7%.
Why the study?
Real-world clinical and economic outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy using the EmboTrap device in the United States had not been investigated.
What are the real-world clinical and economic outcomes associated with the EmboTrap revascularization device for acute ischemic stroke?
Observational (n=318)
What are the real-world clinical and economic outcomes associated with the EmboTrap revascularization device for acute ischemic stroke?
Real-world use of the EmboTrap device for acute ischemic stroke demonstrates an in-hospital mortality of 10.7% and an intracranial hemorrhage rate of 16.7%.
Supports real-world EmboTrap use in AIS thrombectomy; leaves open need for comparative effectiveness trials.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The EmboTrap revascularization device (CERENOVUS, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, Irvine, California, USA) has an innovative, dual layer feature designed to facilitate thrombus retrieval. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the real-world clinical and economic outcomes among patients with AIS undergoing MT using the EmboTrap device in the United States (US). METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent MT for AIS using the EmboTrap device between July 2018 and December 2020 were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database. Patient outcomes included discharge status (including in-hospital mortality), mean length of stay (LOS), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), mean hospital costs, and 30-day readmissions (all-cause, cardiovascular (CV)-related, and AIS-related). RESULTS: A total of 318 patients (mean age 68.5±14.6 years) with AIS treated with the EmboTrap device as the only stent retriever used were identified. Approximately 25% of patients were discharged to home/home health organization, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 10.7%. The rate of ICH was 16.7%. Mean hospital LOS was 9.9±11.3 days, and the mean hospital costs were US$47 367±30 297. The 30-day readmission rate was 9.6% for all-causes, 5.9% for CV-related causes, and 2.6% for AIS-related causes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in the US to report real-world outcomes sourced by retrospective database analysis among patients with AIS undergoing MT using the EmboTrap device. Further research is needed to better understand performance of the EmboTrap device in real-world settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinjikji et al. (2021) conducted an observational in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (n=318). EmboTrap revascularization device was evaluated on in-hospital mortality. Among 318 patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy with the EmboTrap device, in-hospital mortality was 10.7% and the intracranial hemorrhage rate was 16.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: